Initial commit: Clean DSS implementation
Migrated from design-system-swarm with fresh git history.
Old project history preserved in /home/overbits/apps/design-system-swarm
Core components:
- MCP Server (Python FastAPI with mcp 1.23.1)
- Claude Plugin (agents, commands, skills, strategies, hooks, core)
- DSS Backend (dss-mvp1 - token translation, Figma sync)
- Admin UI (Node.js/React)
- Server (Node.js/Express)
- Storybook integration (dss-mvp1/.storybook)
Self-contained configuration:
- All paths relative or use DSS_BASE_PATH=/home/overbits/dss
- PYTHONPATH configured for dss-mvp1 and dss-claude-plugin
- .env file with all configuration
- Claude plugin uses ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} for portability
Migration completed: $(date)
🤖 Clean migration with full functionality preserved
This commit is contained in:
Digital Production Factory
180
.knowledge/adrs/archived/operational/KICKOFF_AGENDA.md
Normal file
180
.knowledge/adrs/archived/operational/KICKOFF_AGENDA.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
|
||||
# DSS Principles Pilot - Kickoff Meeting Agenda
|
||||
|
||||
**Date**: [DATE - THIS WEEK, e.g., Thursday Dec 12]
|
||||
**Time**: [TIME - 30 minutes, e.g., 2:00 PM - 2:30 PM]
|
||||
**Location**: [LOCATION - Zoom link or conference room]
|
||||
**Attendees**: [PILOT TEAM NAMES], [FACILITATOR NAME]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Meeting Objective
|
||||
|
||||
Align the pilot team on the lightweight ADR (Architecture Decision Record) process, demonstrate its simplicity, and collaboratively write your first ADR to build confidence and momentum.
|
||||
|
||||
**This is NOT**: A mandate. A heavy process. Bureaucracy.
|
||||
**This IS**: An experiment to help us capture "why" decisions are made. Your honest feedback on whether it's valuable is the goal.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Agenda (30 minutes)
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. The "Why" (5 minutes)
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal**: Frame the experiment and acknowledge their role as partners.
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Points**:
|
||||
- "Thanks for being our partners in this pilot. Your feedback is what makes this work."
|
||||
- **The Problem**: We've all asked, "Why did we do it this way?" Git history tells you *what* changed, but not *why*.
|
||||
- **The Hypothesis**: A lightweight, in-repo method for capturing decision rationale will help us move faster, reduce ambiguity, and make our principles real (not just a document).
|
||||
- **Success Criteria**: Not that you love everything about it—success is getting your honest, critical feedback. Is this helpful or just noise?
|
||||
|
||||
**Talking Points**:
|
||||
- Reference a recent past decision from the team: "Remember when we debated [example decision]? That rationale lived in Slack and now it's lost. We want to capture that."
|
||||
- Emphasize the lightness: "This is not a heavyweight process. It's 15 minutes to document a decision. That's it."
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. The "How" (10 minutes)
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal**: Demonstrate the tools are simple and unintimidating.
|
||||
|
||||
**Activity**: Live screen share. Show, don't just tell.
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Show the directory** (1 min)
|
||||
- Navigate to `.knowledge/adrs/`
|
||||
- "Everything lives right here, next to the code it relates to."
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Show the template** (2 min)
|
||||
- Open `000-template.md`
|
||||
- "This is the entire template. It's just Markdown with metadata at the top."
|
||||
- Briefly explain:
|
||||
- `status`: Keeps decisions current (Proposed → Accepted → Deprecated or Superseded)
|
||||
- `principles`: Connects the decision back to our core principles (strengthens adoption)
|
||||
- `related`: Links to docs, other ADRs, and PRs (builds the knowledge graph)
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Show the meta-ADR** (3 min)
|
||||
- Open `001-use-markdown-adrs-for-dss-architecture-decisions.md`
|
||||
- "We're dogfooding this. Here's the ADR we wrote for the decision to use ADRs. As you can see, it's short and to the point."
|
||||
- Highlight the sections: Context, Decision, Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Show the PR integration** (2 min)
|
||||
- "When you implement a decision, your PR will have a new section asking you to link the ADR. One line. That's it."
|
||||
- Show the updated PR template (section below)
|
||||
- "This connects the decision to the code."
|
||||
- Emphasize: "The process is not in the way; it's integrated into how you already work."
|
||||
|
||||
5. **Clarify scope** (2 min)
|
||||
- "Not every technical decision needs an ADR. Use this for significant decisions:"
|
||||
- Impact multiple components
|
||||
- Have trade-offs or alternatives
|
||||
- Will be referenced in future decisions
|
||||
- Need rationale captured for future developers
|
||||
- "Bug fixes, naming decisions, small refactors—those don't need ADRs. Use code comments instead."
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. The "First Pancake" (10 minutes)
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal**: Write an ADR together to prove the process is lightweight and approachable.
|
||||
|
||||
This is the most critical part of the meeting. It transforms understanding into confidence.
|
||||
|
||||
**Setup**:
|
||||
- "Let's do this right now. What's a foundational decision you're making on `dss_sync_figma` right now or have just settled on?"
|
||||
- Prompt examples if needed:
|
||||
- "How will you handle Figma API authentication? Store tokens locally or remotely?"
|
||||
- "What's your caching strategy for Figma data between runs?"
|
||||
- "What's the architecture for syncing Figma changes back to the project?"
|
||||
- "Which Python library will you use for async operations?"
|
||||
|
||||
**Execution**:
|
||||
1. Someone shares their screen (you or the tech lead)
|
||||
2. Copy `000-template.md` to `002-[decision-title].md` (show this in real-time)
|
||||
3. Fill it out collaboratively:
|
||||
- You type, pilot team provides the content
|
||||
- Aim for ~10 minutes total
|
||||
- **Don't aim for perfection**—the goal is to prove it's not intimidating
|
||||
- Get to "Accepted" status if there's consensus; otherwise "Proposed" is fine
|
||||
4. Save and show: "That's it. One file, 10 minutes, decision captured."
|
||||
|
||||
**During this exercise, demonstrate**:
|
||||
- YAML is easy (just copy the block, change the values)
|
||||
- Markdown is familiar (everyone writes it)
|
||||
- "Consequences" are often the most valuable part (forces you to think through trade-offs)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. The "Ask" & Next Steps (5 minutes)
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal**: Set clear expectations for the pilot period and establish check-in cadence.
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Points**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **The Ask**:
|
||||
- "Over the next 3-4 weeks, create 1-3 more ADRs for the most significant decisions on `dss_sync_figma`."
|
||||
- "A good rule of thumb: If a decision has long-term consequences, isn't easily reversible, or had interesting trade-offs, it's a good candidate."
|
||||
- "Link them from your PRs using the PR template: 'Implements ADR-NNN'"
|
||||
|
||||
2. **The Support**:
|
||||
- "I'll check in informally to see how it's going. If you feel any friction, let me know immediately. We want to learn from that."
|
||||
- "Ask questions. You're not alone in this—we're figuring it out together."
|
||||
|
||||
3. **The Follow-up**:
|
||||
- "We'll schedule a 30-minute retrospective in about 4 weeks to get all your feedback."
|
||||
- "At that point, we decide: Is this valuable? Do we refine it? Do we expand it to other teams?"
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Open the floor**:
|
||||
- "Any immediate questions, concerns, or thoughts?"
|
||||
- Listen. Address concerns directly. Be honest if you don't know something.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Signals (What You're Looking For)
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ Team creates 1-3 ADRs during the pilot
|
||||
- ✅ No major complaints about the process being burdensome
|
||||
- ✅ At least one person says, "Oh, I see why this matters"
|
||||
- ✅ Team links ADRs in PRs without being asked twice
|
||||
- ✅ Honest feedback in the retrospective (positive or negative)
|
||||
|
||||
## Red Flags (If You See These, Adjust)
|
||||
|
||||
- ❌ "This feels like extra bureaucracy" → Emphasize lightness; show template is only 15 min
|
||||
- ❌ "I don't know what counts as a significant decision" → Provide 1-2 concrete examples from their project
|
||||
- ❌ "Do we have to do this?" → No, it's a pilot. But we're counting on your feedback to make it better
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes for Facilitator
|
||||
|
||||
- **Be confident but humble**: You're not selling a policy; you're piloting an experiment together.
|
||||
- **Listen more than you talk**: Their skepticism and honest feedback are golden. Encourage it.
|
||||
- **Don't over-explain**: The template and example speak for themselves.
|
||||
- **Use time wisely**: The "First Pancake" exercise is worth the time; if you run short elsewhere, cut context. The live writing is the proof point.
|
||||
- **End on invitation, not mandate**: "We're excited to see what you learn. Let's reconvene in 4 weeks."
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Post-Meeting
|
||||
|
||||
Send a follow-up message to the pilot team:
|
||||
```
|
||||
Great kickoff! Here's what we covered:
|
||||
|
||||
• ADR template: .knowledge/adrs/000-template.md
|
||||
• The "why" behind ADRs: .knowledge/adrs/001-use-markdown-adrs-for-dss-architecture-decisions.md
|
||||
• Questions? Check: .knowledge/adrs/README.md
|
||||
|
||||
Next steps:
|
||||
1. Create 1-3 ADRs over the next month for significant dss_sync_figma decisions
|
||||
2. Link them in PRs (see PR template update)
|
||||
3. Give us feedback in the retro (Week 4)
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks for being our pilot team. Your honest feedback is what makes this work. 🚀
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Prepared for**: DSS Principles Pilot Program
|
||||
**Pilot Project**: dss_sync_figma
|
||||
**Week 1 of 4**
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user