Bruno Sarlo
4de266de61
Some checks failed
DSS Project Analysis / dss-context-update (push) Has been cancelled
This reverts commit 72cb7319f5.
146 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
146 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: dss-quick-wins
|
|
description: Find quick win opportunities for design system adoption
|
|
arguments:
|
|
- name: path
|
|
description: Path to project directory
|
|
required: false
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# DSS Quick Wins Command
|
|
|
|
Find low-effort, high-impact opportunities for design system adoption.
|
|
|
|
## Usage
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
/dss-quick-wins [path]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Examples:
|
|
```
|
|
/dss-quick-wins
|
|
/dss-quick-wins ./src
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## What This Does
|
|
|
|
1. **Analyzes Codebase**
|
|
- Scans styles and components
|
|
- Identifies patterns
|
|
- Measures usage frequency
|
|
|
|
2. **Finds Opportunities**
|
|
- Color consolidation
|
|
- Spacing standardization
|
|
- Typography cleanup
|
|
- Border radius normalization
|
|
- Shadow standardization
|
|
|
|
3. **Scores by Impact/Effort**
|
|
- Calculates potential impact
|
|
- Estimates implementation effort
|
|
- Ranks by ROI
|
|
|
|
4. **Generates Recommendations**
|
|
- Prioritized list
|
|
- Specific actions
|
|
- Expected outcomes
|
|
|
|
## Instructions for Claude
|
|
|
|
When the user runs this command:
|
|
|
|
1. Use `dss_find_quick_wins` tool with path
|
|
2. Present quick wins in priority order
|
|
3. For each quick win, show:
|
|
- Category (colors, spacing, etc.)
|
|
- Impact level (high/medium/low)
|
|
- Effort level (high/medium/low)
|
|
- Specific values to consolidate
|
|
- Files affected
|
|
4. Provide total time estimate
|
|
5. Offer to implement top quick wins
|
|
|
|
## Example Output
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Quick Win Analysis: /path/to/project
|
|
|
|
TOP QUICK WINS
|
|
|
|
1. COLOR CONSOLIDATION
|
|
Impact: HIGH | Effort: LOW
|
|
|
|
Found 47 color values reducible to 8 tokens
|
|
Files affected: 23
|
|
|
|
Consolidate:
|
|
#0066cc, #0067cd, #0065cb -> primary
|
|
#6c757d, #6b747c, #6d767e -> secondary
|
|
|
|
Estimated time: 2 hours
|
|
|
|
2. SPACING STANDARDIZATION
|
|
Impact: HIGH | Effort: LOW
|
|
|
|
Found 34 spacing values reducible to 6 tokens
|
|
Files affected: 31
|
|
|
|
Consolidate to 4px grid:
|
|
4px, 8px, 16px, 24px, 32px, 48px
|
|
|
|
Estimated time: 3 hours
|
|
|
|
3. BORDER RADIUS NORMALIZATION
|
|
Impact: MEDIUM | Effort: LOW
|
|
|
|
Found 12 radius values reducible to 4 tokens
|
|
Files affected: 15
|
|
|
|
Consolidate:
|
|
2px (sm), 4px (md), 8px (lg), 16px (xl)
|
|
|
|
Estimated time: 1 hour
|
|
|
|
4. SHADOW CLEANUP
|
|
Impact: MEDIUM | Effort: LOW
|
|
|
|
Found 8 shadow definitions reducible to 3 tokens
|
|
Files affected: 12
|
|
|
|
Consolidate:
|
|
sm: 0 1px 2px rgba(0,0,0,0.05)
|
|
md: 0 4px 6px rgba(0,0,0,0.1)
|
|
lg: 0 10px 15px rgba(0,0,0,0.1)
|
|
|
|
Estimated time: 1 hour
|
|
|
|
5. FONT SIZE SCALE
|
|
Impact: HIGH | Effort: MEDIUM
|
|
|
|
Found 15 font sizes reducible to 7 tokens
|
|
Files affected: 28
|
|
|
|
Consolidate to type scale:
|
|
12px, 14px, 16px, 18px, 24px, 32px, 48px
|
|
|
|
Estimated time: 3 hours
|
|
|
|
SUMMARY
|
|
|
|
Total quick wins: 5
|
|
Total estimated time: 10 hours
|
|
Expected impact: 60% reduction in style inconsistency
|
|
|
|
RECOMMENDED ORDER
|
|
|
|
1. Colors (biggest impact)
|
|
2. Spacing (most widespread)
|
|
3. Border radius (quick win)
|
|
4. Shadows (contained scope)
|
|
5. Font sizes (needs coordination)
|
|
|
|
Ready to implement? I can create tokens for any of these.
|
|
```
|